Stacy Muur

观点

Stacy Muur

Stacy Muur

03-30 15:28

Polymarket said back in December that they wanted to leave Polygon and build their own Ethereum L2. No chain has shipped yet, no date given, but the intent is out there. The dependency since then has only gotten worse. March 2026 numbers: → 77% of Polygon's gas consumption → 67% of gas fees → 55% of all transactions If you look at the bigger picture, Polygon is highly focused on payments. Stablecoin P2P volume is growing completely independently of Polymarket. That growth is real and it has nothing to do with prediction markets. But, if you look at the economics, a prediction market generates constant, high-frequency transactions that pay priority fees. A stablecoin transfer costs almost nothing in gas. Those two things are not interchangeable. You'd need dramatically more payment activity to produce the same fee revenue that one prediction market app generates today. Polygon's team says if Polymarket leaves, blockspace opens up, gas adjusts down, and other apps fill the gap over time. That's reasonable in theory. But the claim that Polymarket "isn't most of the chain" by transaction count doesn't hold up, it's 55% of all transactions, not just gas. The payments story under Polygon is legitimate. But when a single app accounts for the majority of your chain's activity across gas, fees, and transactions, and that app is openly working on leaving, that's not something you can hand-wave with "other apps will fill the gap."
Stacy Muur

Stacy Muur

03-01 20:10

Most crypto tokens are designed backwards. You make money by selling, not by holding. Which means every other holder is your competition from day one. Founders are timing their vesting unlock, investors are timing theirs, and retail is trying to front-run both. Nobody is actually aligned; everyone is just playing musical chairs. The fix isn't complicated in theory, if holders earn by holding rather than selling, the incentive flips. You stop trying to outmaneuver other holders and start trying to grow the protocol. Your competition becomes other protocols, not your own community. The reason it hasn't happened comes down to two things: • Distributing revenue to holders looked too much like an unregistered security under existing law. That legal risk killed the idea before it started for most teams. • The infrastructure to do it cheaply didn't exist. Gas costs on the mainnet Ethereum made programmatic revenue distribution impractical. L2s solved the second problem, and L1 is scaling. Regulation is close to solving the first. The teams paying attention to this now have a real head start. Worth reading the full piece ↓